Comments on: Bears Things You Think You Should Be Excited For Next Season [But Really Shouldn't]

By: NFL draft

NFL draft — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:07:18 +0000

That isn’t to say the trade was “bad” or will end up looking that way. Just acknowledging it was certainly as good of a move for the Broncos as it could’ve been for the Bears.
yes,I areed with you.merry chrimas!

By: His Jesusness Shuttlesworth

His Jesusness Shuttlesworth — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:53:33 +0000

… That isn’t to say the trade was “bad” or will end up looking that way. Just acknowledging it was certainly as good of a move for the Broncos as it could’ve been for the Bears.

By: His Jesusness Shuttlesworth

His Jesusness Shuttlesworth — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:51:22 +0000

To answer Living with Balls’ question.. many people. Two first round picks sure to be top 10 or better, and a capable quarterback who has won more games in his career than Cutler. I thought the trade was “fair” when it happened. Now I’m understandably pessimistic, even considering the money will save from not having to draft 2 first rounders… Oh gosh, the things we could do with 2 first rounders…

By: Sports on the Web | Gunaxin Sports

Sports on the Web | Gunaxin Sports — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:17:23 +0000

[...] You have no reason to be excited about the Chicago Bears [Not Qualified to Comment] [...]

By: Living with Balls

Living with Balls — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:06:37 +0000

Man…who knew the Broncos would get the better deal from the Cutler trade.

By: docksquad

docksquad — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:39:14 +0000

sad but true..