Blogs: Guinea Pigs for Mainstream Media

July 23, 2009 at 11:45 am | Media
By: StevieY19

It’s no secret that Stormin’ Norman and myself hold ESPN in the lowest regard. Gone are the days when I would watch Sportscenter four times per day, use anchor catchphrases in everyday life, and tolerate Chris Berman. Junior High was great though.

I also believe I’m past the days of picking apart everything the WWL does and blasting them for it. Instead of being pissed that the Red Sox and Yankees led off the show even though they may have played the Orioles and Rangers, I’ll need a full 15 to 20 minutes of Sawks-Yanks to start the show in order to fume. Now with the emergence and swarm of the blog world, this has turned into more of a blogs vs. msm issue.

For all the slamming of blogs done by the mainstream media, they were quick to use us in regard to some stories this week. Not “us” as in NQTC–we’re trying to keep the Andrews thing on the DL until Stormin’ Norman can destroy evidence–but blogs in general. Where was the Erin Andrews story in the mainstream media early this week? Even if you picked up one of those archaic newspapers you wouldn’t have seen it mentioned.

Was it really news though? I honestly wasn’t sure, because as much as the sports blog types and their readers are infatuated with Andrews, she’s probably not that big of a deal. So msm got a pass for staying mum on the story. Then it hit CNN, it hit Fox News; I even saw a story in the Tribune. The story is almost a week old! Some of these “reputable” media outlets even played the video or showed stills from it. With the Andrews story, it is clear to see what new function blogs are performing: testing.

All these news outlets allowed the story to make its way around the Internet for a few days and sat back to gauge reaction. Not only that, but they let the shock factor wear off. By the time these stories hit, just about every male sports fan had either seen the video or picked up a nasty computer virus, allowing the networks to show the video while falling just short of being completely appalling, which I guess is what they strive for.

ESPN gets a pass on the sideline princess saga, because…you know…awkward! However, shame on them for the Ben Roethlisberger incident. Their official comment was something about how they don’t report on civil cases? Really? Deadspin pointed out that most civil cases they have reported on are at least tied to criminal matters, but this sounds more like an excuse on the level you use to get out of going to someones wedding. In fact, one civil case involving Rich Rodriguez and West Virginia comes to mind as an example to the contrary.

The WWL’s Blog Buzz has also been suspiciously absent from the program.  I guess they only use it when they like what blogs are talking about. 

So do what you like, mainstream media, but we’re not going anywhere and now that you’ve figured that out you’re changing the way you do things.  We’re in your brain-case!

Bookmark and Share


Ballhype: hype it up!

Related Posts:





Comments

Comment from Stormin’ Norman Disciple
Time July 23, 2009 at 7:26 pm

F#$% ESPN. I am definitely not past picking apart everything ESPN does.

Comment from Rob
Time July 24, 2009 at 11:07 am

They wasted NO TIME posting up that Pac-Man strip club video though. Yeah, I’m saying it…that was some racist bullshit.

Comment from Nels
Time August 19, 2009 at 10:31 am

Here here. I stopped reading ESPN about 5 years ago. I tend to avoid MSM in general just because most of the reporting isn’t relevant to my interests.

Write a comment