<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Derrick Rose Cheated, Why Should I Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/2009/06/derrick-rose-cheated-why-should-i-care.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/2009/06/derrick-rose-cheated-why-should-i-care.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/2009/06/derrick-rose-cheated-why-should-i-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/?p=3179#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>You are correct in some kids motivations.

I the Memphis case, the NCAA has not presented any information to Memphis to support their may &quot;libelous&quot; accustions concerning Rose.

Memphis essentailly said that there is a level of proof that is required to make certain charges about a person.  Given that Memphis has good lawyers, I&#039;m sure that Memphis was not willing to cross that line.

But is the NCAA willing to cross the line.

The NCAA should be careful.  Memphis has made it very clear that details will be given to the public.

AND if they are incorrect (NCAA), Rose has $90M to sue the NCAA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct in some kids motivations.</p>
<p>I the Memphis case, the NCAA has not presented any information to Memphis to support their may &#8220;libelous&#8221; accustions concerning Rose.</p>
<p>Memphis essentailly said that there is a level of proof that is required to make certain charges about a person.  Given that Memphis has good lawyers, I&#8217;m sure that Memphis was not willing to cross that line.</p>
<p>But is the NCAA willing to cross the line.</p>
<p>The NCAA should be careful.  Memphis has made it very clear that details will be given to the public.</p>
<p>AND if they are incorrect (NCAA), Rose has $90M to sue the NCAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glook</title>
		<link>http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/2009/06/derrick-rose-cheated-why-should-i-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>Glook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/?p=3179#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>Neon Bodeaux agrees as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neon Bodeaux agrees as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter sacks</title>
		<link>http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/2009/06/derrick-rose-cheated-why-should-i-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>peter sacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notqualifiedtocomment.com/?p=3179#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>excellent point SN.  these tests are culturally biased and are terrible indicators of future success and character.  additionally, none of this has been proven.  memphis&#039; internal report did not conclude that rose cheated on his SAT.  why not take the man at his word until proven wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent point SN.  these tests are culturally biased and are terrible indicators of future success and character.  additionally, none of this has been proven.  memphis&#8217; internal report did not conclude that rose cheated on his SAT.  why not take the man at his word until proven wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
